Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
Date: 2009-04-09 21:59:42
Message-ID: 200904092159.n39Lxh201358@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Mario Splivalo wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> writes:
> >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
> > 
> > I think you just did.  Applied, thanks.
> 
> I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 
> documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).
> 
> > PS: why'd you omit unnest()?
> 
> I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry.

Did unnest() get added properly too?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-04-09 22:23:41
Subject: Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-04-07 23:45:24
Subject: Re: log_min_duration_statement units

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group