Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-03-30 14:16:43
Message-ID: 200903301416.n2UEGhe21561@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
> > I modified my previous patch to use a two-argument function solution.
> 
> It sounds like everyone has converged on agreeing that this way is okay
> for 8.4?  Object now or hold your peace ...

What are we doing with PQinitSSL()?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-30 14:18:29
Subject: Re: 8.3.5: Crash in CountActiveBackends() - lockless race?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-03-30 14:13:24
Subject: Re: psql \d* and system objects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group