Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql \d* and system objects

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql \d* and system objects
Date: 2009-03-29 19:04:45
Message-ID: 200903291904.n2TJ4jm10426@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I actually was expecting the above example to show me the user function,
> which I was then going to rant about being a lie.  But the actual
> behavior is even worse than that.
> 
> There is not anything that is not broken about HEAD's behavior,
> and the sooner we admit that the sooner we can get to a fix.
> Slicing the categorization more finely or in different ways is
> not going to improve matters: the concept that there is a categorization
> that will make it hide requested objects is wrong to begin with.

You can say it is broken, but what is your proposal?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-29 21:21:37
Subject: TupleTableSlot API problem
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-03-29 18:56:28
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group