Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Date: 2009-03-28 19:31:17
Message-ID: 200903281931.n2SJVHp15381@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce, Simon,
>
> > I don't think there is an agreed todo item there. We were in the middle
> > of discussing other ideas and this is the wrong time to have a longer
> > debate on the topic. We should not squash other ideas by putting this as
> > a todo item yet.
>
> I agree. We don't have consensus on the TODO. We need to hash it out
> more after 8.4 goes beta.

OK, I am confused, but item removed. :-|

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-28 19:51:15 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-28 19:28:33 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Temporarily (I hope) disable flattening of IN/EXISTS sublinks