From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TODO item |
Date: | 2009-03-28 14:18:39 |
Message-ID: | 200903281418.n2SEIdn04481@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Jaime" == Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
>
> Jaime> In the TODO list there is an item "[D] Completed itemAdd
> Jaime> array_agg() and UNNEST functions for arrays " marked as done
> Jaime> but 5 items below there is: "Add SQL-standard array_agg() and
> Jaime> unnest() array functions " it's the same item so this one
> Jaime> should be removed... or there is a difference between the
> Jaime> array_agg() and unnest() implemented versus SQL-standard
> Jaime> array_agg() and unnest()?
>
> The array_agg() does, I believe, match the standard one, at least
> my reading of the spec doesn't reveal any obvious issues there.
>
> The unnest() implementation is largely unrelated to the standard one,
> which is impossible to provide without LATERAL.
I removed the duplicate item; we can add more details about what
additional functionality we need once we get user feedback.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-03-28 14:21:47 | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-03-28 13:25:02 | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |