Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres on filer via NFS

From: "R(dot)P(dot) Aditya" <aditya(at)grot(dot)org>
To: Brian Ghidinelli <brian(at)pukkasoft(dot)com>
Cc: SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres on filer via NFS
Date: 2009-03-25 00:19:29
Message-ID: 20090325001929.GA25492@mighty.grot.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: sfpug
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:36:30PM -0700, Brian Ghidinelli wrote:
> Sorry for the newb question around filers; is there any truth in this 
> (old) recommendation re: NFS still?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/hw_performance/node11.html
> 
> If not, perhaps it should have a caveat or be removed as it turns up in 
> searches and threads?
> 
> 
> Brian, looking at NetApp FAS250 for ~40GB Postgres storage

Depending on your IO needs, running via NFS on a Netapp is perfectly feasible
and has some distinct advantages (fast backups using snapshots are the most
compelling):

  http://archives.postgresql.org/sfpug/2008-06/msg00007.php

make sure you have enough NFS client threads...

Adi

In response to

sfpug by date

Next:From: Miho IshikuraDate: 2009-03-25 00:28:35
Subject: Re: Resources for Postgres and MySQL comparison presentation?
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2009-03-24 23:57:00
Subject: Re: Postgres on filer via NFS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group