Re: Bad news approval

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad news approval
Date: 2009-03-17 18:29:03
Message-ID: 200903171429.04204.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:03:31 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > That was my bad. For some reason I thought we had an exception for
> > products that are introducing PostgreSQL support into thier products. I
> > guess that isn't the case?
>
> Yeah, but not betas. Look at it this way; if we're only allowing them one
> announcement per 6 months, then their final release will get no
> announcement.

Well, this assumes the final release is within 6 months of the beta
announcement, which is probably true, though GMail is still in beta. I guess
assuming a priori knowledge of the product release cycle should be done in
favor of increasing the beta pool to help ensure solid support upon release.
Thanks for the clarification. :-)

--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-17 18:50:58 Re: Bad news approval
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-03-17 18:23:07 Re: List Message Footer