Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Date: 2009-02-26 16:07:45
Message-ID: 200902261607.n1QG7j303684@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >> I think his reply states that. The long and short is, what Tom was
> >> concerned about is true and Heikki has confirmed it. This patch as nice
> >> as it would be to have, isn't ready for prime time. It is time to push
> >> this patch to 8.5, close up the rest of whatever is left with other
> >> patches and move to Beta.
> >
> > The decision on whether it is ready lies with Heikki, and whilst he is
> > prepared to work on it, and there are other patches still in the queue
> > being worked on by other committers there is no reason to bump it yet
> > (unless Heikki wants to look at the other patches).
>
> Well, this is a key point. If Heikki thinks that the patch isn't
> going to be ready for 8.4 (and it sounds like that's the case), then
> it would be more beneficial to the project for him to lay it aside for
> a few weeks and help clean out the rest of the patch queue rather than
> continuing to work on that patch and leaving the other patches to the
> other committers. Our rate of progress on cleaning out the November
> CommitFest seems to be asymptotically approaching zero (9 patches
> committed in December, 6 in January, 4 so far in February...) so
> benching one of the main committers for a feature that won't be ready
> anyway is not a good trade-off.

Agreed, we could use Heikki's help in closing the other outstanding
patches, and if hot standby isn't going to make 8.4, which I agree with,
it would be good for him to put hot standby aside and help on other
patches.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2009-02-26 16:10:48 Re: GIN fast insert
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-26 16:02:34 Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches