Re: Clarification to catalog-pg-class

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >>>> Currently, catalog-pg-class is a bit confusing as to where FKs are
> >>>> tracked in pg_class. Please update the lines for relchecks and
> >>>> reltriggers to read:
> >>>>
> >>>> relchecks int2 Number of check constraints on the table (but not
> >>>> other types of constraints); see pg_constraint catalog
> >>> Uh, why do we have to say "but" when we clearly say "check constraints"?
> >>> Do we need to say "CHECK" contraints?
> >> Because I've encountered two people on IRC (and a client) who were
> >> confused about this, and it confused me briefly when I fielded their
> >> questions. Saying "CHECK constraints" would also probably do it, or
> >> saying "check constraints (only)"
> >
> > Uppercase done, with <literal> tag.
>
> This is inconsistent with the rest of the documentation.

Should I use <emphasis>? <literal>?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +