Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_listener entries deleted under heavy NOTIFY load only on Windows

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Marshall, Steve" <smarshall(at)wsi(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_listener entries deleted under heavy NOTIFY load only on Windows
Date: 2009-02-09 15:17:17
Message-ID: 200902091517.n19FHHY19664@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Marshall, Steve wrote:
> Any thoughts on whether or not this patch should be included in a future
> PostgreSQL release?  If so, any thoughts on additional testing, etc,
> that needs to be done?  Should the patch be added to a minor release of
> 8.3, or only included forward in 8.4?  In my opinion, this is a pretty
> serious error causing some major problems and workarounds in systems I
> am working on, should I would vote for inclusion in minor releases.
> 
> The post below seems to have become disassociated from the rest of the
> thread on this bug, perhaps because it was issued in February, and the
> rest of the thread was posted in January.  Is there any way to make the
> mailing list archives link these messages back to the rest of the
> thread?

I am tracking this item and was waiting for someone to reply to it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Daniel MigowskiDate: 2009-02-10 00:04:02
Subject: Set-returning functions only allowed if written in language 'sql'
Previous:From: Marshall, SteveDate: 2009-02-09 15:11:45
Subject: Re: pg_listener entries deleted under heavy NOTIFY load only on Windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group