Re: Clarification to catalog-pg-class

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clarification to catalog-pg-class
Date: 2009-02-07 20:12:44
Message-ID: 200902072012.n17KCi419498@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > The count was only used to determine if we should check for triggers, so
> > we now use a boolean; the code checks are the same.
>
> Hmmm. In the beta publicity and release notes, we should warn tool
> designers about this. It's quite possible that some of them (SQLManger,
> etc.) were using the counts for something. No reason to surprise them.

Well, we have never documented system table changes in any previous
release, and never got a request to document them either.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2009-02-09 00:41:12 typo in ref/psql-ref.sgml
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-02-07 19:37:03 Re: Clarification to catalog-pg-class