| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Date: | 2009-01-31 14:28:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20090131142831.GA8102@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:43:13PM -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
> I guess I'd still like some more convenient tuning of autovacuum (perhaps
> specifying X mbps disk I/O); but I'd say vacuum fell off my pet-peeve list
> around the 8.1 timeframe.
ah yes, that reminds me. If I know what my disk subsystem is capable of
I'd like to be able to say: VACUUM, please don't use more than 10MB/s.
You can do it now with a calculator and a lot of reading the docs but
surely Pg can work this out for itself.
Nicest would be ofcourse a niceness level, so that VACUUM slows itself
down according to the amount of queries going on (to a minimum
ofcourse).
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shane Ambler | 2009-01-31 14:52:03 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Previous Message | Luis Neves | 2009-01-31 13:39:20 | Re: Pet Peeves? |