Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-29 20:43:38
Message-ID: 20090129204338.GA4064@merkur.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:22:28PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I'm putting together a talk on "PostgreSQL Pet Peeves" for discussion at
> > FOSDEM 2009 this year. I have a pretty good idea what some them are of course,
> > but I would be interested to hear if people have any complaints from personal
> > experience. What would be most interesting is if you can explain an example of
> > when the problem caused real inconvenience to you, since sometimes it's hard
> > to see from a theoretical description where the real harm lies.
> >
> > So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> > things which rub you the wrong way?
>
> No foreign keys in inheritance trees
+1

Or, in other words, no indices across table (am I wrong ?).

GNUmed uses table inheritance quite extensively and could
save an additional key column per child table.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2009-01-29 20:46:46 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2009-01-29 20:32:54 Re: Pet Peeves?