On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:18:17PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:57 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > * Neither of them let you set up Slony (or any other replication
> > system) to start with.
> pgAdmin does (well, barring installation and setting up slon.conf):
It's exactly that setup that's the peeve. I don't think that this is
an easy problem to fix, as the general one needs filesystem access to
more than one machine, even machines without PostgreSQL installed, for
the case where the slons are on separate boxes.
It's just a peeve. :)
On the other hand, lack of a good set of startup tools has pretty much
tanked Slony adoption :(
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-01-29 17:29:07|
|Subject: Re: Changing owner of pg_toast tables |
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2009-01-29 17:22:28|
|Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?|