Re: Pet Peeves?

From: rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-29 20:10:33
Message-ID: 20090129121033.fb66dd4c.Rhubbell@iHubbell.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Another "Pet Peeve":

Where oh where is pg_config? Oh where oh where can it be?

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:16:17 +0000
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

>
> I'm putting together a talk on "PostgreSQL Pet Peeves" for discussion at
> FOSDEM 2009 this year. I have a pretty good idea what some them are of course,
> but I would be interested to hear if people have any complaints from personal
> experience. What would be most interesting is if you can explain an example of
> when the problem caused real inconvenience to you, since sometimes it's hard
> to see from a theoretical description where the real harm lies.
>
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?
>
> Feel free to respond on-list or if you prefer in personal emails. I do intend
> to use the ideas you give in my presentation so mark anything you wouldn't be
> happy to see in a slide at a conference some day.
>
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

In response to

  • Pet Peeves? at 2009-01-29 13:16:17 from Gregory Stark

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2009-01-29 20:14:13 need contact in Nepal
Previous Message Alan Hodgson 2009-01-29 19:59:32 Re: md5 doesn't work (Was Re: Pet Peeves?)