| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade project status |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 15:05:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20090127150544.GL8123@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> Either way, there's no point to discuss that in detail until there
> actually is a working implementation out there... perl will do fine
> until then. Once we have that, we can discuss if doing it in C will be
> worthwhile, or if we're just going to require perl for that one feature.
+1
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-27 15:06:00 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-01-27 14:56:13 | Re: pg_upgrade project status |