| From: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Ja??kiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | paulo matadr <saddoness(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |
| Date: | 2009-01-21 15:13:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20090121151356.GB28522@it.is.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:07:13PM +0000, Grzegorz Ja??kiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, paulo matadr <saddoness(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> > My system have very large ram size, so its possible review postgresql.conf ?
> >
> all depends on how you access DB, what type of drivers (odbc, libpq, etc, etc).
> See, every time you pass a row , they usually have to allocate that
> much memory, not only its quite inefficient, but also slow.
>
> As for the configuration option, I am interested in knowing myself too :)
>
I do not think that the size limit is a runtime option. It is currently
compiled into the server.
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-01-21 15:14:45 | Re: autovacuum daemon |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-21 15:07:13 | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-01-21 15:32:02 | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-21 15:07:13 | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |