Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?

From: "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>
To: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>,Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Date: 2009-01-05 01:34:07
Message-ID: 20090105013407.GA20002@cuci.nl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
James Mansion wrote:
>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent me 
>>>from
>>>   changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)?

>>copyright licenses and patents

>Would it be possible to have a plugin facility?

>I guess the most likely candidate is the LZJB mechanism in ZFS which is 
>CDDL licensed.

The most likely candidate for a speedy algorithm seems QuickLZ, the author
is willing to accomodate the licensing.
-- 
Sincerely,
           Stephen R. van den Berg.

Climate is what you expect.  Weather is what you get.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-01-05 01:40:59
Subject: Re: generic reloptions improvement
Previous:From: Stephen R. van den BergDate: 2009-01-05 01:30:38
Subject: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group