Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Attached is the latest parallel restore patch. I think this is getting  
> fairly close.

Some random comments

- please #define the return type of prestore().  Also, that it returns
in one platform and exits in another seems weird as an API.  I think it
should return in both cases, and have the caller act appropriately.

- RestoreArchiveParallel has too many #ifdef WIN32.  It should be
possible to split it so that the cruft is contained better.

- Aren't there too many checks for libz presence?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

• parallel restore at 2008-12-29 23:42:00 from Andrew Dunstan

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Martin Pihlak	Date: 2009-01-04 20:13:42
	Subject: Re: dblink vs SQL/MED
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2009-01-04 18:01:06
	Subject: Re: pg_stats queries versus per-database encodings