Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: reloptions and toast tables

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Subject: Re: reloptions and toast tables
Date: 2009-01-03 15:24:34
Message-ID: 20090103152434.GC4858@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dave Page wrote:

> Are we expecting this patch (or whatever it turns into) to go into
> 8.4? It was marked as WIP when feature freeze started and clearly
> still is quite undefined at this stage.

Right.  This is a fair objection.  I started just by reviewing the
autovacuum-in-reloptions patch, but it turned out to be unworkable in
quite some ways, so I'm reworking it.

I need some more opinions on whether I should continue working here, or
stop and leave it for 8.5.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-03 15:26:18
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-01-03 15:20:43
Subject: Re: generic reloptions improvement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group