Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken

From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Date: 2009-01-02 21:33:34
Message-ID: 20090102213334.GW12094@yugib.highrise.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Has this gone anywhere? Is the CVS repo safe yet?

a.

> * Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [081229 09:50]:
> > I had originally sent this mail in April, but it appears to have been blocked
> > because the attachment was too large.
> >
> > While we are in the process of dealing with CVS-Git conversion, we should also
> > apply this fixup to make the CVS repository more sane.
> >
> > Could someone with write access to the repository files apply this patch?
> >
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 1. April 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> > > The problem appears to be that several tags around the time of PostgreSQL
> > > 7.1 are broken or inconsistent.
> >
> > Here is a patch to bring the REL7_1 tag in line with the released tarball.
> >
> > The cvsps errors with the REL7_1_BETA* tags appear to be of a different
> > nature. I haven't been able to fix those yet.
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-01-02 21:43:40 Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Previous Message Stephen R. van den Berg 2009-01-02 21:19:00 Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?