Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Greg Stark wrote:
> > > >> Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the  
> > > >> whole source tree considiered one work?
> > > > 
> > > > One work, I assume.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I am not a lawyer, but if its one work, why is there a notice in every source 
> > > file?  ISTM that if it were one work there would only have to be one notice.
> > 
> > Because people often take source files and copy them for use in other
> > projects.
> 
> I think the correct resolution to the question is to ask legal. Yes?

So I can get three different answers?  It is not a priority for me.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

• Re: Copyright update at 2009-01-01 20:16:32 from Joshua D. Drake

Responses

• Re: Copyright update at 2009-01-02 04:00:22 from Robert Treat

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2009-01-01 20:30:26
	Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2009-01-01 20:28:43
	Subject: Re: Copyright update