Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Copyright update

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Copyright update
Date: 2009-01-01 20:28:51
Message-ID: 200901012028.n01KSp023127@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Greg Stark wrote:
> > > >> Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the  
> > > >> whole source tree considiered one work?
> > > > 
> > > > One work, I assume.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I am not a lawyer, but if its one work, why is there a notice in every source 
> > > file?  ISTM that if it were one work there would only have to be one notice.
> > 
> > Because people often take source files and copy them for use in other
> > projects.
> 
> I think the correct resolution to the question is to ask legal. Yes?

So I can get three different answers?  It is not a priority for me.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-01-01 20:30:26
Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-01 20:28:43
Subject: Re: Copyright update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group