Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 01:25:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > 2008/12/31 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> >> Maybe we could have a separate function which returned the info
> >> in various columns (OUT params). Maybe it would be useful to
> >> normalize the info as reported the buildfarm, which right now is
> >> a bit ad-hoc.
>
> > All should be GUC read only variables - It is cheep.
>
> Not as cheap as a single added function. If we need to provide
> these fields broken out --- and no one has demonstrated any need to
> do so --- then I'd support Alvaro's suggestion.

+1 for broken-out fields in columns per Alvaro.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate