Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5

From: Michael Monnerie <michael(dot)monnerie(at)is(dot)it-management(dot)at>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5
Date: 2008-12-19 02:11:57
Message-ID: 200812190311.58087@zmi.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> You should do a VACUUM and then a REINDEX.

Thank you. And as I just learned about CLUSTER... would the correct 
order be CLUSTER, VACUUM, REINDEX ? I guess so, as CLUSTER helps a lot 
with cleaning up already, so there's less work for VACUUM/REINDEX. 
Right?

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-12-19 03:09:59
Subject: Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5
Previous:From: Craig RingerDate: 2008-12-19 01:25:29
Subject: Re: Fwd: Not so simple query and a half million loop

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group