Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5

From: Michael Monnerie <michael(dot)monnerie(at)is(dot)it-management(dot)at>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5
Date: 2008-12-17 09:10:52
Message-ID: 200812171010.53114@zmi.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Mittwoch 06 August 2008 Torsten Luettgert wrote:
> reindexdb dbname
> vacuumdb -f -z dbname

Just a question on this: Is the order correct or would a vacuum+reindex 
be more correct?

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net                   Key-ID: 1C1209B4

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Michael MonnerieDate: 2008-12-17 12:05:28
Subject: Re: pgCluster and PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-12-17 03:31:15
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group