Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I never got the change applied because of Alvaro's objection so
> there is nothing to revert. Alvaro said he has an idea for improved
> wording; I do not.
I think we should add a more explicit note, like in the attached patch.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-12-16 14:48:36|
|Subject: "managing kernel resources" and platform-specific notes|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2008-12-16 03:13:21|
|Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-12-16 14:44:42|
|Subject: Re: non unique value error... pgsql,,help needed. |
|Previous:||From: Robert Lor||Date: 2008-12-16 14:40:23|
|Subject: Re: DTrace probes patch|
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2008-12-16 14:50:02|
|Subject: Re: How can we see details of function in psql prompt|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-12-16 13:45:42|
|Subject: Re: rebellious pg stats collector (reopened case)|