Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I don't find it any clearer ... I think the missing clue is that if you
> >> specify shared_buffers values in MB, you must divide the value by block
> >> size.
> > Well, the heading says "object" now so I thought it would suggest we are
> > talking about objects and not bytes.
> I'm with Alvaro: neither of those changes were improvements.
OK, I never got the change applied because of Alvaro's objection so
there is nothing to revert. Alvaro said he has an idea for improved
wording; I do not.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-12-16 14:43:27|
|Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2008-12-16 03:12:32|
|Subject: Re: triggers on views?|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2008-12-16 03:18:33|
|Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin|
|Previous:||From: Emmanuel Cecchet||Date: 2008-12-16 02:05:16|
|Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Laszlo Nagy||Date: 2008-12-16 12:00:54|
|Subject: rebellious pg stats collector (reopened case)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-12-16 00:35:38|
|Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax |