Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Date: 2008-12-01 15:07:47
Message-ID: 20081201150747.GD4459@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David E. Wheeler wrote:

> Oh, well yeah, it should be consistent. But I'm still not sure that :3
> should be allowed. OTOH, who does that, anyway?

Anyone who prints times as %d:%d:%d. You can find those in the wild.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2008-12-01 15:09:23 Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-12-01 15:05:50 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new