On Monday 24 November 2008 09:10:29 Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> That would defeat the point. Not that I have any great feelings either
> >> way, but fwiw, Microsoft and Oracle both create a sample database
> >> iirc.
> > Last I checked, MS did it optionally only, no?
> Yes, but it defaults on iirc. We can emulate that behaviour in an
> installer (and do in Postgres Plus for example), but that doesn't help
> users of other distributions.
We actually have such a database on pgfoundry already
(http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/1719/pagila-0.10.1.zip), which i think
devrim may have packaged into an rpm; it wouldn't hurt to add it to the win32
installer, but would you feel better if it were a contrib module or
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: ITAGAKI Takahiro||Date: 2008-11-25 02:42:00|
|Subject: Comments to Synchronous replication patch v3|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-11-25 01:20:58|
|Subject: Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |