Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaitsmoderator approval]

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaitsmoderator approval]
Date: 2008-10-28 15:32:43
Message-ID: 20081028153243.GA4912@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Joshua D. Drake escribió:

> I was clarifying what is actually going on. There never was a  
> lists.postgresql.us list for discussion. There is a .us list for  
> discussion, it is pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org and it has never been  
> moderated.
>
> The ".us" list to which she is referring is members(at)(dot) That list was  
> designed to be an announcement list and is indeed moderated.

I don't understand how this setup makes any sense at all.  It is bound
to be confusing.  Why don't you guys have both lists under
postgresql.us?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Selena DeckelmannDate: 2008-10-28 15:35:02
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Previous:From: Michael Alan BrewerDate: 2008-10-28 15:20:19
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group