Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: specificity of claims

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: specificity of claims
Date: 2008-10-26 06:42:55
Message-ID: 20081026064255.GA23726@svr2.hagander.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:28:43PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:49:16 -0700
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> 
> > Ron,
> > 
> > > Shouldn't the project get a legal opinion on how to handle patent
> > > issues on the lists?
> > 
> > You're right, we should publish this somewhere.  If you believe that
> > you have knowledge of a specific, genuine infringement, then you
> > should send the information you have to pgsql-core (and not to a
> > public mailing list).  Core will then seek legal help if it looks
> > like the risk is serious.
> > 
> > Any idea where we could put that policy up that people would see it?
> > 
> 
> We can put it on the wiki and lock the page.

Developer FAQ?

//Magnus


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Steve AtkinsDate: 2008-10-26 06:44:42
Subject: Re: specificity of claims
Previous:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2008-10-26 05:28:43
Subject: Re: specificity of claims

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group