Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: specificity of claims

From: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: specificity of claims
Date: 2008-10-26 05:28:43
Message-ID: 20081025222843.425ad84c@jd-laptop (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:49:16 -0700
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> Ron,
> 
> > Shouldn't the project get a legal opinion on how to handle patent
> > issues on the lists?
> 
> You're right, we should publish this somewhere.  If you believe that
> you have knowledge of a specific, genuine infringement, then you
> should send the information you have to pgsql-core (and not to a
> public mailing list).  Core will then seek legal help if it looks
> like the risk is serious.
> 
> Any idea where we could put that policy up that people would see it?
> 

We can put it on the wiki and lock the page.

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/



In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-10-26 06:42:55
Subject: Re: specificity of claims
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-10-26 03:49:16
Subject: Re: specificity of claims

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group