Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?
Date: 2008-10-23 21:32:06
Message-ID: 200810231732.06912.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thursday 23 October 2008 16:03:09 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > personally if someone does know that there is a patent, i'd rather we
> > heard about it before we put the code in than after.
>
> 90% of granted patents are invalid. And *nobody* on our mailing lists is
> capable of judging validity *or* infringement.
>

100% of "granted" patents are valid until proven otherwise.

> So you, Robert, are basically encouraging people to troll our lists with
> spurious patent issues. Please stop it, right now.
>

I think that is probably better than encouraging people to add knowlingly
infringing code into our source tree, which is what you, Josh, are basically
doing.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Drake 2008-10-24 03:08:03 Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-10-23 20:03:09 Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?