Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>
Subject: Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?
Date: 2008-10-23 19:22:25
Message-ID: 200810231522.26253.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Thursday 23 October 2008 13:17:43 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > Someone mentioned to me that IBM and Oracle have several patents in this
> > area, is anyone looking into that angle?
>
> That would be an *extremely* bad idea.  In patentland, ignorance is
> actually a defense.
>
> So, if anyone *does* know about patents in this area, please keep that
> knowledge to yourself.
>

I doubt it would be much of a defense given what you just posted... 

personally if someone does know that there is a patent, i'd rather we heard 
about it before we put the code in than after. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-10-23 20:03:09
Subject: Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2008-10-23 18:01:55
Subject: Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group