Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: still alive?

From: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: still alive?
Date: 2008-10-02 00:08:00
Message-ID: 20081001170800.2ad6e94d@jd-laptop (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:05:00 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> 
> Marc, care to do the honors?

KILL IT!!!!!! :P

> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >>> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> > >>>> I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?
> > >>> I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?
> > >> Hmm, let's try this:
> > >>
> > >> Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate
> > >> from hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
> > > 
> > > Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to
> > > stick.
> > 
> > I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is
> > someone to actually kill it.  All the talk has been talked,
> > everything has been decided, now someone with the right permission
> > bits just turn it off.
> 


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/



In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-10-02 00:29:35
Subject: Re: still alive?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-10-02 00:05:00
Subject: Re: still alive?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group