| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
| Date: | 2008-09-23 20:14:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200809231314.43398.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Chris,
> This does not strike me as a particularly useful exercise. If I
> intended such a rewrite, I'd much rather consider using something
> *interestingly* different from C, like Erlang or Eiffel or Haskell.
And if you were going to do *that*, you'd also rewrite the database to
operate entirely in-memory over a cluster of anonymous servers.
At which point the only thing left of PostgreSQL would be the parser.
Hmmm, this is sounding familiar somehow ...
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason Long | 2008-09-23 20:36:51 | Slony vs Longiste |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-09-23 20:09:14 | Re: [GENERAL] 8.3.4 rpms for Opensuse10.3 64bit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-09-23 20:35:44 | Re: EXEC_BACKEND |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-23 19:53:59 | Re: parallel pg_restore |