Re: Bug introduced in 8.0

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug introduced in 8.0
Date: 2008-08-27 16:58:12
Message-ID: 20080827165811.GG18946@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 08:46:33PM -0400, Lew wrote:
> upgrades to PG, it is our duty to inform our bosses of the risk of not
> upgrading, so they can properly assess risks and manage them accordingly.

I agree. It is, by the same token, your duty to yourself to ensure
that, if the answer is, "No," you get that answer in writing so that
future failures are not possibly pinned on you as having been
negligent in installing stability and security releases.

By the way, I always refer to these of late as "security and
stability" rather than "minor" releases. I do that because it
presents them to the target audience in a way that is understandable.
Those releases are, for the project, a maintenance burden and not a
way to introduce features. It's wise to keep that in mind when
presenting such releases to managers responsible for the decision.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2008-08-27 17:05:53 Re: Bug introduced in 8.0
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-08-27 16:43:16 Re: Dumping/Restoring with constraints?