Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dump/restore with bad data and large objects

From: "John T(dot) Dow" <john(at)johntdow(dot)com>
To: "Joshua Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dump/restore with bad data and large objects
Date: 2008-08-25 21:27:26
Message-ID: 200808252128.m7PLS1bD070588@web2.nidhog.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Sorry, I missed that. Thanks again.

Now to put this all into effect.

John

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:25:12 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:

>On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:05:53 -0400
>"John T. Dow" <john(at)johntdow(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Joshua
>> 
>> Thank you very much for answering these various questions.
>> 
>> I guess the compressed format is the best overall solution, except
>> for roles. I find myself having a table with other information about
>> users (application specific user type, etc) so perhaps the thing to
>> do is record enough information there to reconstruct the roles should
>> that become necessary.
>> 
>> Can pg_dump dump roles to plain text? How does pg_dumpall do it,
>
>pg_dumpall -g will dump just roles via plain text.
>
>Joshua D. Drake
>-- 
>The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
>PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
>United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
>Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>



In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-08-25 23:19:02
Subject: Re: Trigger function is not called
Previous:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2008-08-25 21:25:12
Subject: Re: Dump/restore with bad data and large objects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group