Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2008-08-22 01:19:58
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane escribió:
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:22:28 +0300
> > "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> The idea would be to use psql as backend for some other system?
> >> Or what do you mean by fed directly?
> > No, I meant that one would do any ad hoc query and cut and paste the
> > output directly into a tracking tool that supports ReST.
> There's still the question of whether this covers any needs that aren't
> met just as well by XML or CSV output formats.

I think it does -- I used to use the Latex output format for easy cut'n
pasting.  ReST sounds like it serves the same purpose.  If I had had to
use conversion to XML, it would have been rather painful.

What I wonder is whether this should be a border setting or a format

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-08-22 01:45:57
Subject: Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-08-22 01:17:25
Subject: Re: Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group