Re: RFC: Grants

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: Grants
Date: 2008-08-05 01:07:20
Message-ID: 200808041807.21300.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgus-general

On Monday 04 August 2008 18:00, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:44:50 -0700
>
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > Josh,
> >
> > > However he is not the best candidate from a getting a new person
> > > involved in PostgreSQL, expanding United States based contributions
> > > to the code base, and educating a new person on the innards of
> > > pg_standby. All of which, in my opinion is more important.
> >
> > Well, whatever the definition of "best" is, the question still
> > stands.
>
> Well I bounced it to the attorney just in case but I am pretty sure it
> is not an issue. A 501c3 is subject to its members (similar to a how a
> public for profit is subject to its share holders). Anyway that point
> is moot until we get confirmation from the DWT which I expect tomorrow.

I was just thinking that members voting on something which is to the
finanicial benefit of one of the members is probably not kosher.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgus-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Drake 2008-08-05 01:53:12 Re: RFC: Grants
Previous Message Joshua Drake 2008-08-05 01:00:34 Re: RFC: Grants