Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RFC: Grants

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: Grants
Date: 2008-08-05 01:07:20
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgus-general
On Monday 04 August 2008 18:00, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:44:50 -0700
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > Josh,
> >
> > > However he is not the best candidate from a getting a new person
> > > involved in PostgreSQL, expanding United States based contributions
> > > to the code base, and educating a new person on the innards of
> > > pg_standby. All of which, in my opinion is more important.
> >
> > Well, whatever the definition of "best" is, the question still
> > stands.
> Well I bounced it to the attorney just in case but I am pretty sure it
> is not an issue. A 501c3 is subject to its members (similar to a how a
> public for profit is subject to its share holders).  Anyway that point
> is moot until we get confirmation from the DWT which I expect tomorrow.

I was just thinking that members voting on something which is to the 
finanicial benefit of one of the members is probably not kosher.


Josh Berkus
San Francisco

In response to


pgus-general by date

Next:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2008-08-05 01:53:12
Subject: Re: RFC: Grants
Previous:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2008-08-05 01:00:34
Subject: Re: RFC: Grants

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group