| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. | 
| Date: | 2008-07-25 16:44:08 | 
| Message-ID: | 20080725164408.GN9891@alvh.no-ip.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Gregory Stark escribió:
> "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> 
> > Hmm, if we do that, how would the system resolve something like this?
> >
> > select 1000 + 1000
> 
> Well we have the same problem with 'foo' || 'bar'. The question I think is
> whether the solution there scales to having two different fallback types.
Hmm, right. But you need more than two: consider
alvherre=# select 0.42 + 1;
 ?column? 
----------
     1.42
(1 ligne)
However, it would be neat if this behaved the same as
alvherre=# select '0.42' + 1;
ERROR:  invalid input syntax for integer: "0.42"
STATEMENT:  select '0.42' + 1;
-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-25 17:09:15 | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication | 
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-07-25 16:30:21 | Re: Column level privileges was:(Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences) |