Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date: 2008-07-07 13:45:33
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Sync with current CVS HEAD and post in hackers- too because patches- 
> close to the closing.

I looked this over and it looks good in general.  I was only wondering
about for single-column indexes -- we're storing attribute numbers too,
right?  Would it be too difficult to strip them out in that case?

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bernd HelmleDate: 2008-07-07 13:46:38
Subject: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output
Previous:From: Bernd HelmleDate: 2008-07-07 13:20:49
Subject: Missing descriptions for aggregates

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2008-07-07 13:58:17
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Previous:From: Yoshiyuki AsabaDate: 2008-07-07 07:22:21
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group