Quick Links

Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ?

From:	Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To:	pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc:	"Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kevin kempter" <kevin(at)kevinkempterllc(dot)com>
Subject:	Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ?
Date:	2008-06-26 22:31:01
Message-ID:	200806261531.03892.josh@agliodbs.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-performance

Jonah,

> Hmm, I didn't think the Skype tools could really provide federated
> database functionality without a good amount of custom work. Or, am I
> mistaken?

Sure, what do you think pl/proxy is for?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ? at 2008-06-26 21:40:54 from Jonah H. Harris

Responses

Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ? at 2008-06-27 02:05:14 from Jonah H. Harris
Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ? at 2008-06-27 18:16:57 from Chris Browne

Browse pgsql-performance by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Greg Smith	2008-06-26 23:15:23	Re: Hardware vs Software Raid
Previous Message	Greg Smith	2008-06-26 22:20:15	Re: ??: Postgresql update op is very very slow