Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'd say not. Can't we do some more refactoring and avoid so many
> >> useless conversions? Seems like str_initcap is the wrong primitive API
> >> --- the work ought to be done by a function that takes a char pointer
> >> and a length. That would be a suitable basis for functions operating
> >> on both text datums and C strings.
> > Yea, I thought about that idea too but it is going to add a strlen()
> > calls in some places, but not in critical ones.
> Sure, but the cost-per-byte of the strlen should be a good bit less than
> the cost-per-byte of the actual conversion, so that doesn't bother me
> too much.
> Actually it seems like the hard part is not so much the input
> representation as the output representation --- what should the
> base-level initcap routine return, to be reasonably efficient for
> both cases?
I hadn't gotten to trying it out yet, but I can see the output being a
problem. You can't even really pre-allocate the storage before passing
it because you don't know the length after case change. You could pass
back a char* and repalloc to get the varlena header in there but that is
Add to that that the multi-byte case also has to be converted to wide
characters, so you have text -> char * -> wide chars -> char * -> text
for the most complex case.
I am starto to think that the simplest case is to keep the single-copy
version in there for single-byte encodings and not worry about the
overhead of the multi-byte case.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lee||Date: 2008-06-22 17:52:15|
|Subject: A GUC variable to replace PGBE_ACTIVITY_SIZE|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-22 01:59:24|
|Subject: Re: Simplify formatting.c |