On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:26:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > ? src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/libecpg_compatddll.def
> > ? src/interfaces/ecpg/ecpglib/libecpgddll.def
> > ? src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/libpgtypesddll.def
IIRC these are for MS VC++.
> > I am not sure if these should stay on the source dir (i.e. are they
> > needed in the tarball). If they are supposed to, then I think they
> > should be listed in the corresponding .cvsignore file.
> Makefile.shlib builds these in the distprep action, so I suppose
> they're supposed to be there. libpq .cvsignore's its equivalent
> files, so I'd agree with doing that. It looks like there should be
> three such files in each directory, though, not just one?
Well, in my source tree I have two, one for MS VC++ and one for Borland
C++ Builder. And yes, I can build a third one for MS VC++ as well by
just issuing the corresponding make call. However, I have no idea
whether we need both, the only differ in the lib name:
--- libecpgddll.def 2008-06-20 12:33:29.000000000 +0200
+++ libecpgdll.def 2008-06-20 12:33:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
; DEF file for MS VC++
ECPGallocate_desc @ 1
ECPGconnect @ 2
Maybe someone with more Windows knowledge can explain this? Magnus?
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-20 14:37:33|
|Subject: Re: Not valid dump [8.2.9, 8.3.1] |
|Previous:||From: Zoltan Boszormenyi||Date: 2008-06-20 10:24:13|
|Subject: Re: posix advises ...|