Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators
Date: 2008-06-19 14:26:58
Message-ID: 200806191626.58765.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Making the commutator operator where you need it *is* a general solution.

True. Let me rephrase. The problem is that when dealing with operator names
such as ~~ and &&, coming up with commutator operator names will make a mess
of readability.

> I think there's a syntactic-ambiguity reason why the spec is like that...

OK, that might need to be analyzed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Miller 2008-06-19 14:54:26 Backend Stats Enhancement Request
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-06-19 14:08:11 Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators