Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators
Date: 2008-06-19 14:26:58
Message-ID: 200806191626.58765.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Making the commutator operator where you need it *is* a general solution.

True.  Let me rephrase.  The problem is that when dealing with operator names 
such as ~~ and &&, coming up with commutator operator names will make a mess 
of readability.

> I think there's a syntactic-ambiguity reason why the spec is like that...

OK, that might need to be analyzed.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David MillerDate: 2008-06-19 14:54:26
Subject: Backend Stats Enhancement Request
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-19 14:08:11
Subject: Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group