| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pg Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: relscan.h split |
| Date: | 2008-06-14 23:49:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20080614234901.GG8519@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Perhaps a better idea would be to put the opaque-pointer typedefs into
> heapam.h and genam.h respectively, and then see where you could remove
> inclusions of relscan.h.
Hmm, this seems to be closely equivalent. Patch attached. I also moved
SysScanDescData from genam.h to relscan.h.
> Also, it seemed like some of those .c files had no business poking into
> the scan structs anyway; particularly contrib. Did you check whether
> the inclusions could be avoided?
Not really, unless we were to provide something a routine that returns
the current block of a scan. There are a few occurrences of this:
/* must hold a buffer lock to call HeapTupleSatisfiesUpdate */
LockBuffer(scan->rs_cbuf, BUFFER_LOCK_SHARE);
which of course need the definition. Maybe providing it is not a bad
idea, because that kind of coding is used in the backend too.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| relscan-remove.patch | text/x-diff | 24.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-15 00:48:51 | Re: relscan.h split |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-06-14 21:29:42 | Re: Simplify formatting.c |