Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency infoin DETAIL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency infoin DETAIL
Date: 2008-06-12 17:35:02
Message-ID: 20080612173502.GI5534@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Alex Hunsaker escribió:

> Ok I'm obviously missing something important... Why not Just make the
> various Remove* functions take a list?
> 
> I'm not proposing this patch for actual submission, more of a would this work?
> If I'm not missing something glaring obvious Ill go ahead and make the
> rest of the Remove things behave the same way

I don't think there's anything wrong with that in principle.  However,
does your patch actually work?  The changes in expected/ is unexpected,
I think.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2008-06-12 17:49:36
Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-12 17:04:47
Subject: Re: relscan.h split

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group