Alex Hunsaker escribió:
> Ok I'm obviously missing something important... Why not Just make the
> various Remove* functions take a list?
> I'm not proposing this patch for actual submission, more of a would this work?
> If I'm not missing something glaring obvious Ill go ahead and make the
> rest of the Remove things behave the same way
I don't think there's anything wrong with that in principle. However,
does your patch actually work? The changes in expected/ is unexpected,
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Alex Hunsaker||Date: 2008-06-12 17:49:36|
|Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-12 17:04:47|
|Subject: Re: relscan.h split |