Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency infoin DETAIL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency infoin DETAIL
Date: 2008-06-11 22:11:47
Message-ID: 20080611221147.GS5352@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:

> After looking again, I think that this is not technically very
> difficult, but coming up with something that looks tasteful to everyone
> might be tricky.  In particular I didn't see a nice way to do it without
> using struct ObjectAddress in a bunch of header files that don't
> currently include dependency.h.  A possible response to that is to move
> ObjectAddress into postgres.h, but that seems a bit ugly too.

Ugh.  I thought about having a new header, but that seems overkill.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2008-06-12 07:31:13
Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-11 22:07:45
Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group