Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)

From: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)
Date: 2008-06-11 21:09:45
Message-ID: 20080611210944.GA8231@espresso
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 19:52 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > I couldn't find the swahili so I divert to Russian!
> > >
> > > каталогизировать
> >
> > Hmm - is pg_каталогизировать valid? Or does the prefix change the
> > meaning in some way?
> >
> > We have to get these things right y'know...
>
> пг_каталогизировать
>
> Should do it :) Of course their might be the problem with tab complete.

Hey, it's not пг_каталогизировать but пг_каталог. Even shorter :)

--
Alexey Klyukin http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2008-06-12 02:58:12 Re: Proposal: pulling newsbytes from www.pgfoundry.org
Previous Message Raymond O'Donnell 2008-06-11 20:07:20 Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)